In the first book to offer a feminist analysis of the ethics surrounding genetic enhancement technologies, Sinead Prince boldly challenges the assumption that improving our genes is inherently good for us.

Prince begins by considering what we mean by 'enhancing' genes. Arguing against pro-enhancement scholars such as Nick Bostrom, Julian Suvalescu and John Harris, she calls into question the idea that physiological changes to the human body are necessarily good for the person as a whole. Is it always a good thing to improve memory, for example? After all, it might mean you learn a language more quickly, but you might also remember traumatic memories you would rather forget. Genetic enhancements may perfect the body's abilities, but not necessarily the person's life.

Bringing traditional theories of well-being into the dialogue, Prince proceeds to suggest that well-being is not simply about improved traits or increased capacities, but about freedom and the ability to make choices uncoerced by systemic pressures. Through case studies on cosmetic enhancements and meritocratic ideals, the book reveals how oppressive norms such as patriarchy and capitalism undermine autonomy and authenticity, making many bodily modifications far from liberating: a problem that will only get worse if we permit irreversible genetic enhancements.

Through a combination of feminist theory and rigorous philosophical analysis, A Feminist Ethics of Genetic Enhancement empowers readers to resist narratives that equate worth with perfection and issues a radical call to embrace the unmodified body. In an era of accelerating biotechnologies, this is a timely and essential critique of so-called designer genes and a reminder that we are enough as we are.