I find Fatic’s social and political critiques praiseworthy.... Many of Fatic’s suggestions for improvement are also apt and well-reasoned... Fatic’s social commentary is expert and refreshing.

Philosophical Practice

This thoroughly argued and well written book will cause a lot of controversy because it challenges some basic notions of philosophy, psychology and even law, which assume a moral autonomy of the individual. Fatic deftly argues in favour of a society that cares about its members in a moral sense rather than just satisfies material interests. His logic also has some unexpected and disturbing consequences: If there is no moral autonomy of the individual, then western born jihadists confront the deficiencies of western societies whose lack of care has triggered such radical defections.

Klaus Bachmann, Professor of Political Sciences at SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poland

Aleksandar Fatic delivers a trenchant critique of post-liberalism's moral bankruptcy, and the depravities inculcated by its centrally-institutionalized values. He argues lucidly and passionately for the re-empowerment of local organic communities as antidotes to the monolithic turpitudes and dysfunctional policies of post-liberal statism.

Lou Marinoff, Professor of Philosophy, The City College of New York